Heikki Linnakangas <[email protected]> writes: > I was worried about that too at first, but Fujii pointed out that's OK: see > last paragraph at > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-08/msg01203.php.
Mmm, ok. I'm worried about master-standby-standby setup where the master disappear, we promote a standby and the second standby now feeds from the newly promoted standby. Well we have to reconnect manually in this case, but don't we need some similar stopgaps? Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
