On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > A while ago I wanted to cherry-pick a patch from master to a back-branch > that was initially committed by someone else. That was rejected because > our git server requires author==committer. I don't think that > restriction is particularly useful and should be lifted. I'm not saying > we should let anyone be an author, but within the pool of committers, I > think we should let the mechanics of the git tools determine these > fields.
Just to be clear, what you're saying is we want to change the policy that says "committer must be on list of approved committers && commiter==author" to "committer must be on list of approved committers && author must be on list of approved committers"? Assuming that's what you meant, there is no support for that in the scripts now, but if we agree that's a good thing it should be trivial to add it. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
