Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of sáb sep 22 14:58:04 -0300 2012: > On 3 September 2012 15:20, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
> > On a related note, I apologize that many of these items didn't make it > > into 9.2, though they are committed for 9.3. The good news is that most > > of my work was in documentation improvements and clarifications, that > > could be backpatched to 9.2. I did not bring this up earlier because I > > didn't want to distract the work of making the improvements. > > > > If anyone wants to look at backpatching some of these doc changes into > > 9.2, I will not object. ;-) I am attaching a partial list of doc > > changes that might be considered. (I need to improve my commit messages > > that reference earlier commits by including the old commit tag; my > > apologies.) No one has mentioned backpatching so perhaps these are all > > too minor, which is fine. > > That's a huge number of amendments. Thanks for giving these some > attention Bruce. FWIW I tried to backpatch the changes listed by Bruce and they all seem to apply fine to 9.2 so maybe we should do that -- I see no reason not to. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
