Greg Copeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 23:43, Curt Sampson wrote: >> And I think a detailed description comes most easily when you have >> a logical model to work from.
> I completely agree. This is why I want/wanted to pursue the theory and > existing implementations angle. > Seems like everyone trying to jump on "index spanning" is premature. I agree. Table-spanning indexes would be a large, complex, difficult-to-get-right feature. Before diving into that we should get some idea of just how we'd actually use them, and whether that's the only big chunk of work standing between us and a more useful inheritance feature. I'm afraid we might do all that effort and then discover there are other showstoppers. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org