On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Selena Deckelmann <sel...@chesnok.com> writes: >> The check_temp_buffers() problem seems like a regression and blocks us >> from upgrading to 9.2. The use case are functions that set >> temp_buffers and occasionally are called in a series from a parent >> session. The work around is... a lot of work. > > Uh ... how is that a regression? AFAIK it's been that way right along.
We're running 9.0 - looks like it changed in 9.1, last revision to the relevant line was 6/2011. The group decided not to upgrade to 9.1 last year, but was going to just go directly to 9.2 in the next few weeks. -selena -- http://chesnok.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
