On 2 October 2012 19:06, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>> On 29 July 2012 16:01, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Attached patch changes the startup process so that it creates .done file >>>> whenever WAL file is successfully restored, whether archive mode is >>>> enabled or not. The restored WAL files will not be archived again because >>>> of .done file. >>> >>> The proposed patch works, for archiving only, but I don't like the >>> code. It's a partial refactoring of existing code. >>> >>> I prefer to go for a full re-factoring version for HEAD, and a zero >>> refactoring version for 9.2 since we're deep into beta. > > Isn't it time to push the full re-factoring version to HEAD? If there is no > such version yet, what about pushing the zero refactoring version for now?
If you send a rebased patch, I'll review, but its not high on my radar right now unless you can explain why it should be higher. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
