Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of mar oct 02 17:24:38 -0300 2012: > > On 10/02/2012 03:48 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> >> Well, if that's the rationale then you end up with no schema foo at all > >> (i.e. both die), which seems even more surprising (though I admit it has > >> the advantage of being a simple rule to document.) > > I think we should just disallow putting any contained objects in the > > statement when IF NOT EXISTS is used. It's simple to understand, simple > > to document and implement, and I think it covers all the sane use-cases > > anyway. > > I thought we'd already agreed on this. Well, it's not what the latest proposed patch implements. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
