On Monday, October 08, 2012 10:39:27 PM Andres Freund wrote: > The 'val' parameter is ignored. Trivial patch attached. -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From a4056e1110961c64b56d61a88c0d472c58a80579 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 22:55:14 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Fix MemSetLoop to not ignore the val parameter
This typo didn't have any bad consequences as the only in-core callsite passes in 0 which is the value that was assigned instead of val anyway. --- src/include/c.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/include/c.h b/src/include/c.h index 925d961..8c3ca8c 100644 --- a/src/include/c.h +++ b/src/include/c.h @@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ typedef NameData *Name; long * _stop = (long *) ((char *) _start + (Size) (len)); \ \ while (_start < _stop) \ - *_start++ = 0; \ + *_start++ = val; \ } while (0) -- 1.7.12.289.g0ce9864.dirty
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
