Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 9 October 2012 09:33, Sébastien Lardière <slardi...@hi-media.com> wrote:
>> With the help of Cédric, here's a patch changing the TRUNCATE TABLE
>> command, adding the IF EXISTS option to allow the presence in the list
>> of tables of a missing or invisible table.
> Will apply in 48 hours barring objections.
I object: this doesn't deserve to be fast-tracked like that with no
thought about whether the semantics are actually useful or sensible.
For starters, the use-case hasn't been explained to my satisfaction.
In what situation is it actually helpful to TRUNCATE a table that's
not there yet? Aren't you going to have to do a CREATE IF NOT EXISTS
to keep from failing later in the script? If so, why not just do that
first?
Second, to my mind the point of a multi-table TRUNCATE is to ensure that
all the referenced tables get reset to empty *together*. With something
like this, you'd have no such guarantee. Consider a timeline like this:
Session 1 Session 2
TRUNCATE IF EXISTS a, b, c;
... finds c doesn't exist ...
... working on a and b ...
CREATE TABLE c ( ... );
INSERT INTO c ...;
... commits ...
Now we have a, b, and c, but c isn't empty, violating the expectations
of session 1. So even if there's a use-case for IF EXISTS on a single
table, I think it's very very dubious to allow it in multi-table
commands.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
