2012/10/10 Merlin Moncure <mmonc...@gmail.com>: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Merlin Moncure <mmonc...@gmail.com> writes: >>> ...but isn't pg_table_is_visible overkill for tab completion? >> >> How much does this help? >> >> update pg_proc set procost = 10 where proname = 'pg_table_is_visible'; > > hm, it fixes the problem. Also, at least for 9.2, the procost is > still set at one (just looked). Well, thanks!
can we increase this value in 9.3. I though so default 10 is from 9.0, but it is 1 still. Regards Pavel > > merlin > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
