2012/10/10 Merlin Moncure <[email protected]>: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: >> Merlin Moncure <[email protected]> writes: >>> ...but isn't pg_table_is_visible overkill for tab completion? >> >> How much does this help? >> >> update pg_proc set procost = 10 where proname = 'pg_table_is_visible'; > > hm, it fixes the problem. Also, at least for 9.2, the procost is > still set at one (just looked). Well, thanks!
can we increase this value in 9.3. I though so default 10 is from 9.0, but it is 1 still. Regards Pavel > > merlin > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
