On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 09:29:16PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 08:43:34PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> I think we have to revert and go back to the drawing board on this. > > > Is reverting going to adversely affect users who are already using the > > 9.2 behavior? > > In what way would somebody be relying on the 9.2 behavior?
I don't know. I am just asking if an application could be relying on the 9.2 behavior. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
