Markus Wanner <mar...@bluegap.ch> writes: > On 10/11/2012 03:11 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> The original design intention was that rm_desc should not attempt to >> print any such data, but obviously some folks didn't get the word.
> FWIW: in case the source code contains comments explaining that > intention, I certainly missed them so far. Yeah, if we decide to stick with the limitation, some documentation would be called for. I remember having run into this and having removed functionality from an rm_desc function rather than question the premise. But maybe the extra functionality is worth the cycles. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers