* Josh Berkus (j...@agliodbs.com) wrote:
> Because Snowman asked me for an example:

Thanks. :)

> That's a 25X difference in execution time.  This is not the first time
> I've seen this issue.

If we can figure out an 'easy' solution to this, I'd definitely vote for
it being back-patched.  Having a table simply never get analyze'd
strikes me as a very bad thing.

        Thanks again,

                Stephen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to