2012/10/15 Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net>: > Sorry, but this doesn't strike me as a very good idea at all. Why not just > alter the table ownership after the restore is done?
Yes, I could restore, wrote later ALTER ... OWNER TO ... - but this method allowed me to do it quicker. > If we start allowing > stuff other than the TOC ID to be specified in the list file the > modifications will never end. Understood, sounds reasonably. > BTW, I realize your patch is small, but it's usually a good idea to discuss > an idea on the mailing list before sending in a patch. I've new here, next time I will send idea and wait for response before sending any patch. -- Piotr Gasidło -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
