On 15 October 2012 18:43, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > Perhaps we should take a different tack on this discussion: what feature > development is the continued presense of RULES currently blocking? If > the rest of us had some idea why you considered this deprecation urgent, > it would help!
>From me, this isn't urgent at all, as I've said. But it is one source of disrepute for us that I would have liked to see blocked quicker/better. But we've agreed a way forwards with doc changes and that is enough for now. Personally, I think rules block MERGE, but it has already been agreed that we would ignore rules for that case. But having said that, MERGE is not being worked on currently, so its hardly a hot topic and nothing I was thinking about when I brought up the topic. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
