"Kevin Grittner" <kgri...@mail.com> writes:
> To put that another way, it should be done at a time when it is sure
> that no query sees indisvalid = true and no query has yet seen
> indisready = false. Â Patch attached. Â Will apply if nobody sees a
> problem with it.
The above statement of the requirement doesn't seem to match what you
put in the comment:
> + * All predicate locks on the index are about to be made invalid.
> Promote
> + * them to relation locks on the heap. For correctness this must be done
> + * after the index was last seen with indisready = true and before it is
> + * seen with indisvalid = false.
and the comment is rather vaguely worded too (last seen by what?).
Please wordsmith that a bit more.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
