On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Daniel, I assume you are submitting an updated version based on the > feedback that has been provided. I will mark this patch returned with > feedback in the current CF; please submit the next version to CF3.
Thank you for reminding me, so the approach that seems basically reasonable is to add an overload for these functions to accept a timeline number, if I read this feedback correctly? -- fdr -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
