A Dimecres, 17 d'octubre de 2012 19:13:47, Merlin Moncure va escriure: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On 17 October 2012 14:53, Merlin Moncure <mmonc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Is that defined in the standard? > > > > RETURNING isn't even defined in the standard. > > Right: Point being, assumptions based on implementation ordering are > generally to be avoided unless they are explicitly defined in the > standard or elsewhere.
I don't see how one could use RETURNING if result is not ensured to be in the same order as the tuples supplied. What's the use of RETURNING supplying data in random order? -- Albert Cervera i Areny http://www.NaN-tic.com Tel: +34 93 553 18 03 http://twitter.com/albertnan http://www.nan-tic.com/blog