* Peter Eisentraut (pete...@gmx.net) wrote: > On 10/12/12 3:44 PM, Stephen Frost wrote: > > In general, I think it's good to build on existing implementations where > > possible. Perhaps we could even consider using something which already > > exists for this? > > Sounds like SASL to me.
aiui, that would allow us to support SCRAM and we could support
Kerberos/GSSAPI under SASL as well... Not sure how comfortable folks
would be with moving to that though.
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
