Shigeru HANADA escribió: > Please examine attached v2 patch (note that is should be applied onto > latest dblink_fdw_validator patch).
Tom committed parts of the dblink_fdw_validator patch, but not the removal, so it seems this patch needs to be rebased on top of that somehow. I am not able to say what's the best resolution for that conflict, however. But it seems to me that maybe you will need to choose a different name for the validator after all, to support binary upgrades. There are some other comments downthread that a followup patch probably needs to address too, as well. I am marking this patch Returned with Feedback. Please submit an updated version to CF3. Thanks. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
