Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: >> I think it may be time to bite the bullet and change that (including >> breaking dumpSequence() into two separate functions). I'm a little bit >> worried about the compatibility implications of back-patching such a >> change, though. Is it likely that anybody out there is depending on the >> fact that, eg, pg_dump --section=pre-data currently includes SEQUENCE SET >> items? Personally I think it's more likely that that'd be seen as a >> bug, but ...
FWIW, +1 > Specifically, I'm thinking this, which looks rather bulky but most of > the diff is from reindenting the guts of dumpSequence(). I see that you commited that patch, thanks a lot Tom! Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
