Greg Copeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In what way would providing a generic interface to *monitor* be a > "waste of time"?
As I said -- I don't really see the need for a bunch of replication implementations, and therefore I don't see the need for a generic API to make the whole mess (slightly) more manageable. > In what way would that prevent someone from "producing a readlly > good* replication implementation"? It wouldn't -- it's just that if/when such an implementation exists and everyone who needs replication is using it, a "generic monitoring API" would be pointless. Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
