On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 11:33:47AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> writes: > > There are three different WITH CHECK OPTION options: > > > WITH CHECK OPTION > > WITH CASCADED CHECK OPTION > > WITH LOCAL CHECK OPTION > > No, there are four: the fourth case being if you leave off the phrase > altogether. That's the only case we accept, and it corresponds to the > patch's behavior, ie, don't worry about it.
Good point. I just wanted to get that out there in the archives, as it took a bit of cross-referencing, interpreting and contemplation to come up with something relatively concise. > > Oh, and I'm guessing at least one well-known financial services > > company would just love to have these :) > > It might be material for a future patch, but it's not happening in > this iteration. Right. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
