Simon Riggs wrote: > My goal is to allow COPY to load frozen tuples without causing MVCC > violations.
OK. That wasn't initially clear to me. > Forcing a tightly scoped proposal into a much wider one will just > kill this and leave it blocked. The goal is important enough and narrow enough to merit the approach you're talking about, IMV, at least. Sorry I initially misunderstood what you were going for. -Kevin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
