On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> writes: > > So, I can reproduce the lower threshold, but the exception type does not > agree > > with the one Matthew observed. > > I finally got around to looking at the link you provided about error > 0xC0000409, and realized that I'd been completely confusing it with > stack overflow --- but actually, it's a report that something scribbled > past the end of a finite-size local-variable array. So I now think that > Matthew's stumbled across two completely independent bugs, and we've > fixed only one of them. The 0xC0000409 error is something else, and > possibly a lot worse since it could conceivably be a security issue. > > It still seems likely that the actual location of the bug is either > in PostGIS or in the GIST index code, but without the ability to > reproduce the failure it's awfully hard to find it. Matthew, could > you try a bit harder to find a self-contained test case that produces > that error? > > regards, tom lane > Sure, it might take me a while to find time but I'll keep it on my list. Matt
