On 11/14/12 4:46 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Meh. I didn't care for the explicit dependency on INT_MIN in the > previous patch, and I like introducing INT64_MIN even less. I think > we should be able to reduce the test to just > > if (arg2 == -1) > return 0; > > since zero is the correct result for any value of arg1, not only > INT_MIN.
I agree. Will send a v2. Thanks. :) - xi -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
