2012/12/3 David Fetter <da...@fetter.org>: > On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 03:20:28PM +0100, Kohei KaiGai wrote: >> > However, UPDATE / DELETE support is not perfect right now. >> > In case when we try to update / delete a table with inherited >> > children and RETURNING clause was added, is loses right >> > references to the pseudo columns, even though it works fine >> > without inherited children. >> > >> The attached patch fixed this known problem. > > This patch no longer applies to git master. Any chance of a rebase? > OK, I'll rebese it.
> Also, might this approach work for the catalog? The use case I have > in mind is multi-tenancy, although one can imagine organizations where > internal access controls might be required on it, too. > If you intend to control behavior of DDL commands that internally takes access towards system catalog, RLS feature is not helpful. Please use sepgsql instead. :-) If you intend to control DML commands towards system catalogs, here is nothing special, so I expect it works as we are doing at user tables. Thanks, -- KaiGai Kohei <kai...@kaigai.gr.jp> -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers