On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Pavan Deolasee
<pavan.deola...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Kevin Grittner
> <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote:
>> That makes sense to me.  The reason I didn't make that change when I
>> added the serializable special case to pg_dump was that it seemed
>> like a separate question; I didn't want to complicate an already big
>> patch with unnecessary changes to non-serializable transactions.
> If we agree, should we change that now ?

Sorry for posting on such an old thread. But here is a patch that
fixes this. I'm also adding to the next commitfest so that we don't
lose track of it again.


Pavan Deolasee

Attachment: pg_dump_readonly_xact.patch
Description: Binary data

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to