On 7 December 2012 00:06, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Apparently the magic to preserve those values across cache resets isn't > strong enough for this. Seems bad, because that seems to mean a sinval > overflow leads to this and related optimizations being lost? Which seems to back up the case for it being a hint, that the system might not be able to honor. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
