* Andrew Dunstan (and...@dunslane.net) wrote: > So we'll lose the index definition and leave some files behind? This > sounds a bit messy to say the least.
Agreed. > Making the user fix it seems much more sensible to me. Otherwise I > suspect we'll find users who get strangely surprised when they can > no longer find any trace of an expected index in their upgraded > database. Or preserve it as-is. I don't really like the 'make them fix it' option, as a user could run into that in the middle of a planned upgrade that had been tested and never had that come up. Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature