On 12/09/2012 10:33:59 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't feel particularly qualified to comment, but in the
> interest of (hopefully) helping with the patch review process
> I'm going to comment anyway.
I've gone ahead and signed up to review this patch.
I can confirm that it compiles against head and
the tests pass. I started up a server
and tried it and it works for me, trapping
the exception and executing the exception code.
So, looks good, as far as it goes.
I await your response to my previous message
in this thread before sending it on a
a committer. There were 2 outstanding
issue raised:
Is this useful enough/proceeding in the right
direction to commit now?
Should some of the logic be moved out of a
subroutine and into the calling code?
Regards,
Karl <k...@meme.com>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
