On 17 December 2012 14:16, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakan...@vmware.com> wrote:
> I'm not happy with the fact that we just ignore the problem in a backup > taken from a standby, silently giving the user a backup that won't start up. That's spooky. I just found a different issue with prmotion during backup on your other thread. > Why not include the timeline history file in the backup? That seems like a > good idea regardless of this issue. Yeh > I also wonder if pg_basebackup should > include *all* timeline history files in the backup, not just the latest one > strictly required to restore. Why? the timeline history file includes the previous timelines already. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
