On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 01:20:53PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
> > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Erik Rijkers <e...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> >> That would make such a truncation less frequent, and after all a truncated 
> >> display is not
> >> particular useful.
> 
> > Agreed - it's useful during testing, but not in a typical production
> > use. It might actually be more useful if it's truncated in in the
> > other end (keeping the last 30 instead of the first 30 chars)
> 
> +1 for truncating from the left.  I think pg_upgrade already does that
> in its progress messages.

Yes, it does in the current git tree.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to