On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 01:20:53PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: > > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Erik Rijkers <e...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > >> That would make such a truncation less frequent, and after all a truncated > >> display is not > >> particular useful. > > > Agreed - it's useful during testing, but not in a typical production > > use. It might actually be more useful if it's truncated in in the > > other end (keeping the last 30 instead of the first 30 chars) > > +1 for truncating from the left. I think pg_upgrade already does that > in its progress messages.
Yes, it does in the current git tree. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
