2012/12/21 Tom Lane <[email protected]>: > Marko Tiikkaja <[email protected]> writes: >> Another idea would be to force the STRICT to be immediately after >> INSERT, UPDATE or DELETE. > > What about before it, ie > > STRICT UPDATE ... > > This should dodge the problem of possible conflict with table names, > and it seems to me to read more naturally too.
+1 Pavel > > regards, tom lane > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
