On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 11:10:01AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > BTW, I spent some time looking at the problem, and it seems the issue > is not overrun of any bison internal table, but failure to compress the > resulting "action table" into 32K entries. This means that the required
Ouch! This of course is not so much a problem for ecpg but for the backend should we run into the problem there too. > ... > Also, it seemed to me that the most leverage on the size of the > compressed action table would be gained by reducing the number of > terminal symbols, more so than the number of rules. Dunno if there > is a lot you can do about that, but it's a thought. Will look at it. Michael -- Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL! ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
