On 12/10/12 4:23 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > Well, this is an area that the standard doesn't have anything to say > about. The standard defines errcodes, but not what fields they make > available. I suppose you could say that the patch proposes that they > become a Postgres extension to the standard.
The standard certainly does define extra fields for errors; see <get diagnostics statement>. We have a GET DIAGNOSTICS statement in PL/pgSQL, so there is certainly precedent for all of this. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
