On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Boszormenyi Zoltan <z...@cybertec.at> wrote:
> Hi, > > now that PQconninfo() was committed, I rebased the subsequent > patches. Actual code change was only in the last patch, to > conform to the committed PQconninfo() API. > > I've applied a modified version of the "tar unification" patch to master. It didn't apply cleanly so I ended up redoing a number of the things manually, but the end result is fairly similar. I don't think it'll cause anything but really trivial merge conflicts against the 04 patch, but I didn't actually check that (e.g. it's tarCreateHeader() not _tarCreateHeader() now). I took at look at the basebackup patch as well. Easier to get now that it's commented :) There's quite a lot of code in there whereby it tries to remove recovery.conf from the tar stream if it's already in there. That seems like an ugly way to do it. I see two other options, that I think both are better. If we do need it to be removed, we should probably pass that as a parameter up to the walsender, and make sure the file isn't included in the first place. But we can also leave it in there - the tar format is perfectly happy to have multiple copies of the same file in the archive - it'll just use whichever copy comes last. Given that the code there is already fairly difficult to track, I think just keeping it simpler is definitely worth doing one of those two. I would vote for just leaving two copies of recovery.conf in there. Comments/thoughts from others? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
