* Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I know this has been discussed and rejected before, but I find that > rejection to be wrong-headed. I have repeatedly been asked, with > levels of exasperation ranging from mild to homicidal, why we don't > have this feature, and I have no good answer. If it were somehow > difficult to record this or likely to produce a lot of overhead, that > would be one thing. But it isn't. It's probably a hundred-line > patch, and AFAICS the overhead would be miniscule.
Hi all, The attached patch add a new column into 'pg_database' called 'datcreated' to store the timestamp of database creation. If this feature is approved I could extend it to add a column into 'pg_class' to store creation timestamp too. I think we can discuss about psql support to show this new info about databases... Regards, -- Fabrízio de Royes Mello Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL >> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com >> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
pg_database_add_datcreated_column_v1.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
