On 7 January 2013 07:29, Takeshi Yamamuro <yamamuro.take...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Anyway, the compression speed in lz4 is very fast, so in my > opinion, there is a room to improve the current implementation > in pg_lzcompress. So why don't we use LZ4? -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
