Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Claudio Freire <klaussfre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Rather, I'd propose the default setting should be "-1" or something
>> "default" and "automagic" that works most of the time (but not all).
> A cruder heuristic that might be useful is 3 * shared_buffers.
Both parts of that work for me. It's certainly silly that the default
value of effective_cache_size is now equivalent to the default value
of shared_buffers. And I don't especially like the idea of trying to
make it depend directly on the box's physical RAM, for the same
practical reasons Robert mentioned.
It might be better to use 4 * shared_buffers, as that corresponds to the
multiple that's been the default since 8.2 or so (ie 128MB vs 32MB), and
3x just seems kinda oddball.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
