Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes:
>>> Here is a patch to add an option -I/--idempotent to pg_ctl, the result
>>> of which is that pg_ctl doesn't error on start or stop if the server is
>>> already running or already stopped.

>> Idempotent is a ten-dollar word.  Can we find something that average
>> people wouldn't need to consult a dictionary to understand?

> --no-error perhaps?

Meh, that's probably going too far in the direction of imprecision.
The point of this patch is that only very specific errors are
suppressed.

I don't have a better idea though.  It'd be easier if there were
separate switches for the two cases, then you could call them
--ok-if-running and --ok-if-stopped.  But that's not very workable,
if only because both would want the same single-letter abbreviation.

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to