Tom Lane escribió: > "Erik Rijkers" <e...@xs4all.nl> writes: > > On Sun, January 13, 2013 22:09, Tom Lane wrote: > >> BTW, although Erik claimed this behaved more sanely in 9.2, a closer > >> look at the commit logs says that the bogus commit shipped in 9.2, > >> so AFAICS it's broken there too. > > > [ not so ] > > Hm, you are right, there's another problem that's independent of > search_path. In 9.2, > > regression=# create table pg_catalog.t(f1 int); > ERROR: permission denied to create "pg_catalog.t" > DETAIL: System catalog modifications are currently disallowed. > > but HEAD is missing that error check: > > regression=# create table pg_catalog.t(f1 int); > CREATE TABLE > > I will bet that this is more breakage from the DDL-code refactoring that > has been going on. I am getting closer and closer to wanting that > reverted. KaiGai-san seems to have been throwing out lots of special > cases that were there for good reasons.
Isn't this just a475c6036? -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
