2013/1/15 Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com>: > Kohei KaiGai escribió: > >> The attached patch is a rebased version towards the latest master >> branch, and fix up the issue around error messages on name conflicts. > > I assume the lock.c changes are just a bollixed merge, right? > Yes, I'll check it and rebase it.
> I am not sure about some of the changes in the regression test expected > output; are we really okay with losing the "in schema foo" part in some > of these cases? > The changes in the expected results in regression test originated from elimination of getObjectDescription, but "in schema foo" should be kept. It looks like an obvious my mistake. Sorry. Thanks, -- KaiGai Kohei <kai...@kaigai.gr.jp> -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
