On 01/18/2013 10:34 AM, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2013-01-18 10:31:28 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote: >> On 01/18/2013 09:33 AM, Andres Freund wrote: >>> I have no problem requiring C code to use the even data, be it via >>> hooks or via C functions called from event triggers. The problem I >>> have with putting in some hooks is that I doubt that you can find >>> sensible spots with enough information to actually recreate the DDL >>> for a remote system without doing most of the work for command triggers. >> Is that so much of a problem if it's OK to break it between major >> versions? Maybe require compilation with -DPG_NON_FORWARD_COMPATIBLE to >> make the hooks visible in the headers, so nobody can claim they didn't know? > I can't follow the connection between what you quote from my mail and > what you are saying ;) ... in which case I probably misunderstood part of the discussion. I'm trying to skim things fairly quickly in order to keep up and continue working through the CF backlog.
-- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
