Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > I took a quick look at this and am just curious why we're adding the > requirement that t_tableOid has to be initialized?
I assume he meant it had been left at a random value, which is surely
bad practice even if a specific usage doesn't fall over today.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
