On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 03:29:17PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > Oops, thanks. Here is the right paragraph, same issue: > > > If successfully created, a named portal object lasts till the end of the > > current transaction, unless explicitly destroyed. An unnamed portal is > > destroyed at the end of the transaction, or as soon as the next Bind > > statement specifying the unnamed portal as destination is issued. (Note > > What is the issue exactly? Seems clear and correct to me ... but then, > I think I wrote this text, a long time ago.
Tatsuo's complain was that on sentence said "named portal", while all portals are closed on transaction end. However, "unnamed portal" is named in the next sentence, so it seems OK. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
