On 29 January 2013 00:25, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Of course this wouldn't be material for back-patching, but it seems to > me there's still time to fix this for 9.3, and we should do so if we > want to claim that the enhanced-errors patch uniquely identifies > constraints.
I can see the case for fixing this, but I don't feel that it's particularly important that constraints be uniquely identifiable from the proposed new errdata fields. -- Regards, Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
