Any chance we can resolve this before 7.3? I will add it to the TODO list.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jan Wieck wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Of cource it is nice to have a complete solution > > > immediately but it doesn't seem easy. My patch is > > > only a makeshift solution but fixes the most > > > siginificant case(typical updatable views). > > > > I would like to devise a complete solution *before* we consider > > installing makeshift solutions (which will institutionalize wrong > > behavior). > > > > There seems to be some feeling here that in the presence of rewrites > > you only want to know that "something happened". Are you suggesting > > that the returned tuple count should be the sum of all counts from > > insert, update, and delete actions that happened as a result of the > > query? We could certainly implement that, but it does not seem like > > a good idea to me. > > IMHO the answer should only be a number if the rewritten > querytree list consists of one query of the same command > type. everything else has to lead into "unknown". > > > Jan > > -- > > #======================================================================# > # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # > # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # > #================================================== [EMAIL PROTECTED] # > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
