On 3.2.2013 20:46, Jeff Janes wrote: > On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Tomas Vondra <t...@fuzzy.cz> wrote: >> On 3.1.2013 20:33, Magnus Hagander wrote: >>> >>> Yeah, +1 for a separate directory not in global. >> >> OK, I moved the files from "global/stat" to "stat". > > Why "stat" rather than "pg_stat"? > > The existence of "global" and "base" as exceptions already annoys me. > (Especially when I do a tar -xf in my home directory without > remembering the -C flag). Unless there is some unstated rule behind > what gets a pg_ and what doesn't, I think we should have the "pg_".
I don't think there's a clear naming rule. But I think your suggestion makes perfect sense, especially because we have pg_stat_tmp directory. So now we'd have pg_stat and pg_stat_tmp, which is quite elegant. Tomas -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
