Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2013-02-04 14:55:56 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Andres Freund wrote:
> > > On 2013-02-04 13:22:26 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > 
> > > > +typedef struct RmgrDescData
> > > > +{
> > > > +       void            (*rm_desc) (StringInfo buf, uint8 xl_info, char 
> > > > *rec);
> > > > +} RmgrDescData;
> > > > +
> > > > +extern const RmgrDescData RmgrDescTable[];
> > > > +
> > > 
> > > I think we would at least need to include rm_name here as well.
> > 
> > Not rm_name (that would be duplicative), but a comment with the name of
> > each rmgr's name in its line should be sufficient.
> 
> Maybe I am misunderstanding what you want to do, but xlogdump prints the
> name of the rmgr and allows to filter by it, how would we do that
> without rm_name?

Oh, I thought you wanted it for code documentation purposes only.  Okay,
that makes sense.  (Of course, we'd remove it from RmgrTable).

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to